Federal Defense for Naturalized Citizens Facing Denaturalization
Denaturalization is one of the most severe actions the federal government can take against a U.S. citizen.
It is not an immigration benefit issue.
It is a federal civil enforcement action seeking to revoke citizenship—often followed by removal proceedings.
Our practice is dedicated to defending naturalized U.S. citizens in denaturalization investigations and litigationbrought by the Department of Justice. We represent individuals at every stage of the process, from pre-litigation inquiry through federal court proceedings.
A Practice Focused on Denaturalization Defense
Denaturalization cases are rare, complex, and extraordinarily high-stakes. They require deep familiarity with federal litigation, immigration law, and constitutional due-process principles.
Our work focuses on defending against allegations involving:
Alleged misrepresentation or concealment during the naturalization process
Claims of unlawful procurement of citizenship
Historical conduct alleged to affect eligibility
Materiality and intent disputes
Procedural and jurisdictional defects in government cases
These cases are governed by unique statutes, evidentiary standards, and burdens of proof—and are litigated in federal district court.
Understanding the Government’s Strategy
Denaturalization actions are typically pursued after years of investigation and often rely on historical records, overseas conduct, or retroactive legal interpretations.
We approach these cases with a clear understanding of:
The government’s heightened burden of proof
The limits of retroactive enforcement
Materiality standards established by the Supreme Court
Due-process protections afforded to naturalized citizens
Our defense strategy is grounded in controlling precedent and disciplined federal-court advocacy.
Strategic Federal Litigation — Not Immigration Processing
Denaturalization defense is not form-based immigration practice. It is adversarial litigation requiring careful pleading, motion practice, and evidentiary strategy.
Our representation includes:
Pre-complaint risk assessment and investigation response
Defense against civil denaturalization complaints
Motions to dismiss and dispositive motion practice
Discovery strategy and evidentiary challenges
Trial-level advocacy where necessary
Coordination with related immigration or removal proceedings
Every decision is made with an understanding of both immediate litigation risk and long-term citizenship consequences.
Deliberate Case Evaluation
Not every inquiry leads to litigation—and not every case is defensible in the same way.
We conduct thorough, confidential evaluations before accepting representation, including review of:
Naturalization history and records
Alleged factual or legal bases for denaturalization
Applicable statutory and case law
Potential collateral consequences
If a matter presents significant risk, we explain that candidly. When we proceed, it is because there is a legally defensible position grounded in fact and law.
Representation Rooted in Dignity and Precision
Citizenship is foundational. Allegations threatening it are deeply personal and destabilizing.
We approach these cases with:
Careful, controlled advocacy
Respect for the gravity of citizenship rights
Clear communication with clients and families
Realistic assessments—not false assurances
Our focus is protecting constitutional rights while navigating one of the most aggressive enforcement tools available to the government.
Federal Courts Demand Serious Advocacy
Denaturalization cases are litigated under intense judicial scrutiny. Courts expect:
Exacting compliance with procedural rules
Accurate application of precedent
Disciplined factual development
Professional credibility
That is the level at which we operate.
Consultation and Case Review
We offer confidential consultations for naturalized citizens who have received inquiries, subpoenas, or notices related to denaturalization—or who are concerned about potential exposure.
Early legal review can significantly affect outcomes.